<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Thom Craver &#187; Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomcraver.com/topics/apple-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomcraver.com</link>
	<description>Marketing Mumbles and Tech Talk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 03:38:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>So Verizon Has the iPhone</title>
		<link>http://thomcraver.com/apple-2/so-verizon-has-the-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://thomcraver.com/apple-2/so-verizon-has-the-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomcraver.com/?p=314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does this really mean? iPhone users have a choice &#8211; more reliable phone calls or using voice and data at the same time. The naysayers suggest Verizon&#8217;s network will buckle under the iPhone pressure, just like AT&#38;T.  Verizon announced the addition of 10 new towers to the Midwest area Monday. Tuesday they announced the iPhone and assured customers the network could handle the increased load. Wednesday they announced 16 new towers in the New York Metro area. Most of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does this <em>really</em> mean?</p>
<p>iPhone users have a choice &#8211; more reliable phone calls or using voice and data at the same time. The naysayers suggest Verizon&#8217;s network will buckle under the iPhone pressure, just like AT&amp;T.  Verizon announced the addition of 10 new towers to the Midwest area Monday. Tuesday they announced the iPhone and assured customers the network could handle the increased load. Wednesday they announced <a href="http://www.examiner.com/smartphones-in-national/verizon-turns-on-16-3g-towers-new-york-possibly-preparing-for-iphone">16 new towers</a> in the New York Metro area. Most of them are in the surrounding areas like Suffolk, Westchester and Rockford. Coincidence? Hardly.</p>
<p>The short difference:</p>
<ul>
<li>AT&amp;T&#8217;s network allows the ability to talk and use data together, but is not as reliable.</li>
<li>Verizon&#8217;s network doesn&#8217;t allow for simultaneous usage, but has documented reliability</li>
<li>AT&amp;T has issues with tethering, limits you to one device</li>
<li>Verizon is cool with it and lets you tether up to five devices</li>
</ul>
<h2>Simultaneous Talk and Data Usage</h2>
<p>Both AT&amp;T and Apple have produced enough media fodder together discussing the ability to talk and surf simultaneously. It&#8217;s true. It&#8217;s the functionality of the technologies used by the respective companies. However, many people <strong>really</strong> use both at the same time?</p>
<p>One of the commercials apple produced was a business person getting a call from a colleague, asking if the iPhone user got the latest email just sent. Seriously? Who does this? If you have to call about the email you just send, why send the email in the first place?</p>
<p>iPhone caches email. This means that it keeps the data locally on the phone, without the need to connect to the network. Once headers (the subject, time and sender info) are received, they stay there.  Once you read the message, it is stored and can be read again later regardless of a network connection being available.</p>
<p>John Stewart had a <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-january-11-2011/verizon-iphone-announcement">great take on this</a>, stating people have scarified the ability to call someone for the desire of the iPhone.  Presumably this will change on Verizon&#8217;s network.</p>
<h2>Tethering</h2>
<p>Using your mobile phone and carrier to get your computer or other device online has been an interesting issue with carriers.  Verizon is quick to say they&#8217;ll let you do it, but are now talking about removing the unlimited data option from their plans.</p>
<p>So Verizon will now let you tether up to 5 devices with your iPhone 4. Again, the absurdity of this statement is interesting. It&#8217;s a 3G network. It&#8217;s only about 1Mbps. It might hit 1.5Mbps on a good day. But share 5 devices with it? Not well.</p>
<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>
<p>If you absolutely need to use data (surf, email, etc) while you&#8217;re talking on the phone, go with AT&amp;T. If you prefer it when your phone doesn&#8217;t drop your calls, try Verizon.</p>
<p>If you prefer your smart phone to have a little more G, wait for the new Android 4G phones from AT&amp;T and Verizon. Presumably, iPhone 5 is out this year and will likely be 4G, too.</p>
<p>Watch for the latest <a href="http://techny.com">Computer Link Magazine</a> later this month for my story there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thomcraver.com/apple-2/so-verizon-has-the-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Is Apple So Angry Lately?</title>
		<link>http://thomcraver.com/apple-2/why-is-apple-so-angry-lately/</link>
		<comments>http://thomcraver.com/apple-2/why-is-apple-so-angry-lately/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iprobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thom.cravers.us/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has shown a different side lately. They are aggressive, argumentative, genuinely full of angst. Steve Jobs led this company to the top (twice). Their sales are up in several of their verticals.  Why can't he handle a little competition?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or is Apple in the news for all the wrong reasons lately?  For the company that has recently been listed as the <a title="Google, IBM, Apple - World's Most Valuable Brands (CNET)" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20003629-92.html">#3 most valuable brand</a>, they certainly aren&#8217;t acting like a good brand to support. This week:</p>
<ul>
<li> they have issues with: a <a href="http://thom.cravers.us/apple-2/a-recap-of-lost-iphone-iprobe-2/">careless employee who lost his new iPhone </a>prototype.</li>
<li>they&#8217;re still mad at <a title="Apple - HTC Patent Issue" href="http://thom.cravers.us/apple-2/its-the-apple-patent-tennis-match/">HTC for patent infringement</a>.</li>
<li>they have seemingly <a href="http://thom.cravers.us/google/the-apple-adobe-apple-google-war/">burned bridges with Adobe</a>.</li>
<li>they <a title="Apple Fires Employee for Showing Steve Wozniak new iPad" href="http://gizmodo.com/5523673/steve-wozniak-on-apple-security-employee-termination-and-gray-powell">fired an employee</a> for showing the iPad to Apple <em>co-founder </em>Steve Wozniak at the launch event a half-hour before it started. Seriously?</li>
<li>they are <a href="http://thom.cravers.us/apple-2/there-is-a-lifetime-limit-on-how-many-ipads-you-can-buy/">limiting people from buying multiple iPads</a>.</li>
<li>they&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/japan-retailers-halt-online-apple-sales-2010-04-27">clamped down retailers</a> to try to bolster their own sales.</li>
</ul>
<p>In the meantime, Apple has <a title="Apple Buys 2nd Chip Company" href="http://www.edn.com/article/CA6727408.html">acquired a second mobile device processor company </a>and is trying for a third. Why is that significant? Because these processor companies control which mobile device (like smartphone) manufacturers can license the latest and greatest processors for their devices.  All because Apple doesn&#8217;t like competition.  Anti-trust anyone?</p>
<h2>Wall Street Reacts?</h2>
<p>Apple&#8217;s stock closed at 270.71 last Friday (before the REACT raid on Gizmodo&#8217;s editor). Since then, it&#8217;s declined steadily and closed today (Wednesday) at 261.60. It&#8217;s a small fall at only 9 points. But Apple is coming off a 26-point jump (from 244.60) since announcing their 2Q earnings only a week ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thomcraver.com/apple-2/why-is-apple-so-angry-lately/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Recap of Lost iPhone iProbe</title>
		<link>http://thomcraver.com/apple-2/a-recap-of-lost-iphone-iprobe-2/</link>
		<comments>http://thomcraver.com/apple-2/a-recap-of-lost-iphone-iprobe-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thom.cravers.us/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><b>The Lost iPhone:<b></p>
<p>Has Apple gone too far pursuing their property? Who's really telling the truth and which California and Federal laws <i>really</i> apply here?</p>
<p>This stinks like rotten apples.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Internet blogosphere has been alive for a week now with buzz  about the iPhone that an Apple employee left behind  in a California  bar.  <img class="alignright" title="Gizmodo iPhone 4g" src="http://cache-02.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/04/500x_iphone4_01.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="207" />In a nutshell:</p>
<ol>
<li>March 18th: Apple employee <a href="http://bit.ly/9Hj3KZ ">Gray Powell leaves his iPhone 4G  prototype </a>in a bar.</li>
<li>A college-aged gentleman finds the phone and tries to return it.</li>
<li>After Apple ignored him, he tried to contact Wired and eventually  contacted Engadget and Gizmodo.</li>
<li>A Gizmodo editor agrees to help him return it to Apple and paid him  for an exclusive story.</li>
<li>Apple <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/04/dude-apple/">tracked    down this individual at his home</a>, whom the <a href="http://bit.ly/cG4EZp">police have   identified</a>, but will not  release his name.</li>
<li>April 19th, <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-20002892-37.html">Apple  asked Gizmodo to return it</a> and Gizmodo <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5520479/a-letter-apple-wants-its-secret-iphone-back">agreed </a>and <a title="Apple Gets Back Its iPhone... (CBS News)" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20002987-501465.html">returned  it</a> Monday (April 26th).</li>
<li>In the meantime, Friday (April 23rd), REACT (the CA computer crimes  division) obtained a warrant to search the journalist&#8217;s home; which they  did and <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-20003446-37.html">seize his  computers</a>, servers and UDB drives because they were suspected of  being &#8220;used to commit a crime.&#8221;</li>
<li>The San Mateo DA&#8217;s office still claims they are &#8220;<a href="http://sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2010/04/26/daily36.html">still  not saying it&#8217;s a crime</a>.&#8221;</li>
<li>In the meantime, the editor <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202453303236&amp;Gizmodo_Editor_in_Missing_iPhone_Case_Retains_Criminal_Defense_Lawyer">retained  a criminal defense lawyer</a>, while the prosecutors <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-20003615-37.html">defend  their seizure</a>, but say they won&#8217;t investigate just yet.</li>
</ol>
<p>Oh, and as an FYI &#8211; Apple is one of the 25 companies on the <a href="http://sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2009/05/18/story2.html">REACT  steering committee</a> and <a href="http://sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2010/04/26/daily36.html">asked  for the criminal probe</a>.  The Silicon Valley Blog has a great <a href="http://blogs.siliconvalley.com/gmsv/2010/04/more-data-from-the-iprobe.html">iProbe  recap</a>.  The <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/gizmodo-search-warrant-illegal">EFF  calls it OverREACTing</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thomcraver.com/apple-2/a-recap-of-lost-iphone-iprobe-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s the Apple Patent Tennis Match</title>
		<link>http://thomcraver.com/apple-2/its-the-apple-patent-tennis-match/</link>
		<comments>http://thomcraver.com/apple-2/its-the-apple-patent-tennis-match/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thom.cravers.us/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Apple Claims They Own Patents to Everything</b></p>
<p>Apparently HTC and others violate them, but HTC, Nokia and Elan Microsystems says the Same of Apple.  Tennis, anyone?</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple has always tried to overextend patent rules.  Their new <a href="http://www.patentlyapple.com/patently-apple/2010/04/apple-introduces-us-to-a-new-itunes-concert-ticket-system.html">iTunes  Concert Ticket patent </a>shows that clearly. Many claim that the  patent goes beyond concert tickets. Kit Eaton at FastComany calls it &#8220;<a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/1623803/apple-itravel-booking-id-airport-security-data-login-tsa-iphone-app-rfid-nfc">bizarre  and breathtaking in its scope</a>.&#8221;  <a href="http://washington.nationals.mlb.com/news/press_releases/press_release.jsp?ymd=20070424&amp;content_id=1927277&amp;vkey=pr_was&amp;fext=.jsp&amp;c_id=was">Apple  was beat to the mobile ticket</a> game. So how can they claim the  patent?</p>
<p>Apple is still pursuing <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/apple-sues-htc-for-patent-infringement-85950187.html">HTC  for patent infringement</a>; <a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/03/02patents.html">20  patent infringements </a>to be exact.  HTC&#8217;s (a large Android phone  developer) response is that <a href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/htc-to-apple-you-copied-us/">Apple  copied HTC</a> first.  Today, however, <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=33768">Microsoft signed a patent  agreement with HTC </a>that might trump Apple&#8217;s case.  I wonder if this  has anything to do with TechCrunch&#8217;s exaggerated claims that  <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/27/admob-android-passes-iphone-web-traffic-in-u-s/">Android  Web usage is higher than iPhone&#8217;s</a>?  <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2010/04/27/businessinsider-no-android-did-not-just-pass-iphone-web-traffic-in-the-us-2010-4.DTL">SFGate  says the numbers aren&#8217;t accurate </a>and I do agree on this one.</p>
<p>In the meantime, there&#8217;s now claims that <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/10/22/nokia-apple-lawsuit/">Apple  infringed on Nokia patents </a>and <a href="http://www.theengineer.co.uk/elan-sues-apple-over-patent-claims/1002026.article">Apple  infringed on Elan Microsystems patents</a>, too.  Tennis, anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thomcraver.com/apple-2/its-the-apple-patent-tennis-match/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There is a Lifetime Limit on How Many iPads You Can Buy</title>
		<link>http://thomcraver.com/apple-2/there-is-a-lifetime-limit-on-how-many-ipads-you-can-buy/</link>
		<comments>http://thomcraver.com/apple-2/there-is-a-lifetime-limit-on-how-many-ipads-you-can-buy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thom.cravers.us/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re the parent of twins who are graduating from High School or have a birthday coming up, don&#8217;t go to an Apple Store to buy them iPads and expect to get one of your own, too.  Apparently there is a limit to how many you can buy. It might be two. But Apple Store &#8220;Geniuses&#8221; don&#8217;t have that information. Apparently a medical student who had legitimate reservations to buy iPads was trying to help overseas friends get their iPads, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re the parent of twins who are graduating from High School or  have a birthday coming up, don&#8217;t go to an Apple Store to buy them iPads  and expect to get one of your own, too.  Apparently there is a limit to  how many you can buy. It might be two. But Apple Store &#8220;Geniuses&#8221; don&#8217;t have that information.</p>
<p>Apparently a medical student who had legitimate reservations to buy  iPads was trying to help overseas friends get their iPads, since they  were only for sale in the U.S.  After purchasing several, he was <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/194934/ipad_buyer_banned_for_life_from_more_purchases.html">denied  the right to purchase iPads</a>.  There is apparently a &#8220;lifetime  limit&#8221; on them.</p>
<p>The Apple Store employee would not give any information, <a href="http://www.protocolsnow.com/2010/04/17/how-i-went-from-apple-store-newbie-to-lifetime-ban-in-one-week">repeatedly  dodging they customer&#8217;s questions </a>stating &#8220;you have reached your  lifetime limit&#8221; and &#8220;I do not have that information&#8221; over and over.</p>
<p>And  they call these guys <em>geniuses</em>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thomcraver.com/apple-2/there-is-a-lifetime-limit-on-how-many-ipads-you-can-buy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Apple-Adobe Apple-Google War</title>
		<link>http://thomcraver.com/google/the-apple-adobe-apple-google-war/</link>
		<comments>http://thomcraver.com/google/the-apple-adobe-apple-google-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thom.cravers.us/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has their panties in a wad about Adobe for a while now. Specifically they don&#8217;t like Adobe&#8217;s shortcomings with Flash.  Fine, so the iPhone and iPad will never have Flash and will keep showing the blue box. HTML 5 isn&#8217;t official yet. But Apple is behind it because it reduces the need for third-party software like Flash (Adobe) and Silverlight (Microsoft).  Who cares, right? Those are just two pesky little companies anyway. But the behavior of both Adobe toward [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple has their <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2010/01/29/behind-the-adobe-apple-cold-war/">panties  in a wad about Adobe</a> for a while now. Specifically they don&#8217;t like Adobe&#8217;s shortcomings with  Flash.  Fine, so the <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/04/08/apple-adobe-flash-compiler/">iPhone  and iPad will never have Flash</a> and will keep showing <a href="http://www.blu-rayvideoconverter.net/download/convert-flash-video-to-ipad.jpg">the blue box</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML5">HTML 5 </a>isn&#8217;t official yet. But Apple is behind it because it reduces  the need for third-party software like Flash (Adobe) and Silverlight  (Microsoft).  Who cares, right? Those are just two pesky little  companies anyway. But the behavior of both <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/04/09/apple-adobe-flash-ban/">Adobe  toward Apple </a>and <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/04/10/steve-jobs-adobe/">Apple back at  Adobe</a> are deplorable.</p>
<h2>Et Tu, Google?</h2>
<p>Apple has also forged a war with  Google. Simply put, <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/02/01/steve-jobs-google-adobe/">AppSteve  Jobs hates Google </a>for trying to kill the iPhone. Unchallenged for  the past four years, Apple finally hates that they have real  competition? Are you serious? Oh wait, that&#8217;s what all those patent  claims are all about, aren&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thomcraver.com/google/the-apple-adobe-apple-google-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

